jump to navigation

Thoughts on Madame Bovary by Gustave Flaubert April 21, 2010

Posted by pacejmiller in Book Reviews, Study.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

I’m not going to pretend I know enough about literature to give proper commentary on Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, THE seminal text on “Realism” and widely regarded as one of the greatest novels of all time.  I just finished reading it for my writing theory class (a few weeks late, I might add), and thought I would share some thoughts on the book.

Reading “masterpieces” is always a difficult task.  I won’t lie.  I didn’t find Madame Bovary to be the easiest read.  It’s a simple story, really, of a young married woman who dreams of great romance and an exciting existence, but instead has to deal with the banalities of everyday small town life in France during the early-mid 1800s.  In search of love, Madame Bovary begins affairs with other men, but the consequences are not what she had envisioned.

It’s not hard to see why Madame Bovary is considered such a classic.  It was a revolutionary novel at the time, and a very controversial one.  Back in the day, novels were highly romanticised with flowery language and all things fantastic.  Gustave Flaubert broke away from that mould by writing Madame Bovary with meticulous details of everyday life in plain, honest language, and in doing so became a pioneer in the “Realist” movement.  Many women connected with the titular character, a reflection of just how accurately Flaubert had described the daily lives and emotions of women at the time.

If someone was reading Madame Bovary today without any knowledge of the context, it’s likely they would wonder what the fuss is all about.  The story really is quite plain, and not particularly exciting, especially if you are more used to the action-thrillers of today.  The sentences and paragraphs are long, the descriptions are incredibly detailed, and the tone and dialogue feel somewhat overly dramatic.  For a casual read, it can get a little tedious for the new generation of readers with short attention spans.

However, if you break the novel down a bit more (like I had to because I am studying it), you do see its merit.  The story structure is really quite impeccable, and everything from the character development to choice of words seem to be carefully considered (and that’s taking into account any difficulties in the translation).  Not a surprise considering Flaubert’s infamous reputation as a crazy perfectionist.  Take this from his Wikipedia entry:

Flaubert was fastidious in his devotion to finding the right word (“le mot juste“), and his mode of composition reflected that.  He worked in sullen solitude – sometimes occupying a week in the completion of one page – never satisfied with what he had composed, violently tormenting his brain for the best turn of phrase, the final adjective.  His private letters indeed show that he was not one of those to whom correct, flowing language came naturally. His style was achieved through the unceasing sweat of his brow.

Flaubert took five years to write Madame Bovary, and my lecturer told me that apparently he would sometimes take whole days to write a single sentence or paragraph, and then break down in despair before scrapping it completely.  Almost makes me wish I could care that much about what I write.

I find it quite hilarious that Madame Bovary caused such a scandalous stir when it was first serialised in 1856, because it was regarded as obscene and undermined morals by encouraging adultery.  Even when it was all just innuendo (like “The Contest” episode in Seinfeld) and nothing was actually described in detail.  Of course, Flaubert was acquitted, and it turned out to be quite the publicity generator for him when the book was released in book form.  I can’t imagine what a book like say American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis would have done to society if it was released back then!

Anyway — from a technical standpoint, sure, I get Madame Bovary‘s brilliance.  I certainly learned a lot from it as a writer.  But as a modern reader, I simply couldn’t get very revved up by a story about a housewife committing adultery in a French country town.  Call me a fool, but sorry, I just couldn’t.

[Note: There have been quite a few translations of Madame Bovary (from the original French), and the one I read was the Penguin Classics version by Geoffrey Wall.]

The Shocking Death of Edwin Valero April 21, 2010

Posted by pacejmiller in Boxing, Social/Political Commentary.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

Talk about a shock.

A few days ago, I was stunned to read about the arrest of Venezuelan boxing superstar Edwin Valero for allegedly murdering his wife.  The 28-year-old southpaw isn’t widely known outside of boxing circles, but most who follow the sport know him as the guy with an unblemished 27-0 record, all victories coming by way of knockout.  More remarkably, Valero’s first 18 bouts all ended in the first round, a former world record and a feat that landed him regularly on those wacky Japanese TV shows.

Today, I find out that Valero has committed suicide, hanging himself in his cell with his track pants.  The man who grew from wretched poverty to national hero to drug abuser, wife beater and eventually wife murderer — the man many wanted to see face pound-for-pound champ Manny Pacquiao — ultimately died as a coward.

Opinion is quite divided on Valero and his passing.  Most agree that the boxing world has lost a tremendous talent, but it would be an understatement to say that some are glad this wife beater and supposed murderer (Valero apparently admitted to stabbing his 24-year-old wife Jennifer Carolina Viera) has met his end.

Personally, I wasn’t that high on Valero’s boxing ability.  He was promoted by Pacquiao’s company Top Rank, so of course people would talk about a potential bout between the two men.  In my opinion, it was just talk.  Having watched a few of Valero’s bouts, I wouldn’t have given him a little more than a puncher’s chance against Pacquiao.  Sure Valero had some heavy hands, but he simply wasn’t at Pacquiao’s level yet.  Most of the guys he had fought earlier in his career were bums, some of which had never won a professional bout.

In any case, Valero failed to get a license to fight on US soil because of a brain injury he suffered as a result of a severe motor cycle accident he was involved in (without a helmet) in 2001.  The state of Texas was willing to license him, but after being charged with drink driving there, Valero could not get a visa to enter the country.  Valero believed the refusal to allow him to fight in the US was political, as he was a huge supporter of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, the face of whom he had tattooed across his chest.

Nevertheless, I think Valero’s life tells a very tragic story.  This was a guy who experienced appalling poverty (much like Pacquiao did) growing up, and somehow made a name and fortune for himself through his amazing talents and hard work in the boxing ring.  Inside the ring, Valero was a hero.  Outside of it, he was a mess.  And because no one wanted to believe that a sporting superstar could have serious issues, they pampered him and turned a blind eye to his problems.

Edwin Valero and his wife Jennifer in happier times

Valero was said to be battling serious alcohol and cocaine addiction, and suffered depression on top of it.  Before Valero’s wife was killed, she had allegedly told her family that he “didn’t sleep, he didn’t eat, he used drugs every day and he was growing more violent all the time.”

For a couple of years now, Valero had been linked to reports of domestic abuse — first against his mother and sister, then against his wife, who once reported to hospital with a punctured lung and broken ribs.  Valero was subsequently arrested by police after an argument with medical staff, where he allegedly tried to prevent his wife from speaking to authorities.  She later said that her injuries were sustained from an accidental fall.

In the end, Valero had no one to blame but himself.  But was society complicit in his demise?

“We all looked away, not to admit what was going on,” said Valero’s manager, Jose Castillo.  Authorities “were very permissive with him, and because of that, we’re now in the middle of this tragedy.”

Top 5 Most Underappreciated Hollywood Actors April 21, 2010

Posted by pacejmiller in Entertainment.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
2 comments

I’ve been clearing out some of my old drafts and came across one that for one reason or another never got posted.

As a huge movie buff, I’ve seen my fair share of actors over the years.  Of course, there are the A-list superstars, the Will Smiths, the Brad Pitts and the Tom Cruises (before he lost it on Oprah’s couch) — guys that get paid in the tens of millions no matter what they do.

But what about those guys that have been working hard for years, been in some terrific roles and some wonderful movies, but never got the attention and appreciation they deserved from the general public?  Here are my top 5 most underappreciated actors in Hollywood.

(click on ‘more’ to find out!)

(more…)