Post Oscars Film Blitz March 6, 2011
Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews, Reviews.Tags: Aaron Eckhart, Academy Award, Ashton Kutcher, Burlesque, Christina Aguilera, documentary, Inside Job, Love & Other Drugs, Love and Other Drugs, Natalie Portman, Nicole Kidman, No Strings Attached, Oscars, Rabbit Hole
add a comment
I was supposed to review these films one by one, but I really couldn’t be bothered. So I decided to lump them into a ‘post Oscars’ film blitz, as all of these films were a part of the Oscars. Kind of.
Here we go…
Rabbit Hole (2010)
I’m not usually into depressing films, but I was in a good mood and thought, why the heck not? And seriously, they don’t get much more depressing than Rabbit Hole (I haven’t seen Blue Valentine yet, might add it to the list later).
For those who don’t know what it’s about, let’s just say it’s about profound grief and loss, and how to deal with it and move on. It stars Nicole Kidman in her Oscar-nominated performance, Aaron Eckhart, Diane Wiest and Sandra Oh.
It’s an extremely powerful film, I’ll admit that, and it has some surprisingly amusing sequences, but on the whole, Rabbit Hole is a pretty rough 91 minutes to sit through. I don’t know what else to say without giving away too much.
As for the performances, I know Kidman got all the kudos, but it beats me how after so many years she still can’t pin down that American accent! In all honesty, I preferred Eckhart. I found his scenes more engaging and wondered how Kidman got the nomination and he didn’t.
3.5 stars out of 5
Inside Job (2010)
I rushed out to see Inside Job after it won the Oscar for Best Documentary. It’s essentially a film that attempts to explain how the Global Financial Crisis (ie the one we’re still recovering from) happened, and tries to apportion the blame to the various parties involved.
Ultimately, despite learning a great deal about the history of the financial markets, the financial instruments, and the GFC itself, I was a little disappointed. Props for making this film because I know a lot of people (myself included) would like to know just what the heck happened, and how it happened. However, I did find it somewhat dry in parts and a little too preachy, especially towards the end. Just listen to director Charles Ferguson’s acceptance speech at the Oscars and you’ll get what I mean.
I am by no means trying to defend the greed and the corruption that plagued the system and led to the collapse, but I think it would have been good to see more of the human side of the crisis. Rather than simply painting them as the ‘bad guys’ in all of this, I wanted to see what was going through the minds of these bankers and executives as they raked in the money without regard for the consequences — and I wanted to see how the crisis affected the lives of people on all levels of income and wealth.
It was an interesting film and an important one, but apart from a lot of anger and frustration, I didn’t get the deeper emotional connection and understanding I was expecting.
3.5 stars out of 5
No Strings Attached (2011)
This film was obviously not nominated for an Oscar, but the star, Natalie Portman, did win a Best Actress Oscar for another film (Black Swan), so I guess that’s my Oscar connection to justify this film being in the post.
I remember before the Oscars there were people saying that No Strings Attached is potentially so bad that it might derail Natalie’s Oscar chances. Well, it turned out to be much ado about nothing. And besides, No Strings Attached was not that bad anyway. It was just average, which is not horrible considering that most rom-coms these days are.
Portman’s Emma and Ashton Kutcher’s Adam met when they were teenagers at some camp, and kept bumping into each other over the years. Then Adam’s dad, played by Kevin Kline, does something despicable and sends Adam into a bender and eventually Emma’s house. Yada, yada, yada, you know what happens, but they decide to have a ‘no strings attached’ relationship. And yada, yada, yada, you know what happens in the end.
The film started off promisingly enough. Director Ivan Reitman (pretty mixed bag as a director) infuses the story with quirky humour and likable characters (essential for a good rom-com). There are some genuinely amusing moments and one-liners littered throughout, though mostly at the beginning. Kutcher is kind of always the same — with that cheery, but mopey/dopey looking dude-face, while Portman gets to show her less serious side (with shades of her Saturday Night Live performances?). The chemistry is there, which I must admit surprised me.
As usual, the rom-com shifts from comedy to romance as it strolls along to the predictable finale, and that’s where No Strings Attached fails to bring something fresh to the table. And for what is really a sweet film at heart, it is inexplicably and unnecessarily dirty — I blame that on all the Judd Apatow films in recent years.
3 stars out of 5
Love and Other Drugs (2010)
The Oscar connections are getting more tenuous. Love and Other Drugs features Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Hathaway, the latter of which…hosted the Oscars this year!
Anyway, this is one of those films that I liked more than I should have. It was marketed as a laugh-out-loud, silly rom-com about two promiscuous people, but that’s really only half true — because the second half, which is completely different to the first, is kind of a depressing ‘disease romance’ (I just made that up). To me, both halves were pretty good, even though that does make for a fairly uneven film.
What I liked about the first half was the insight into the pharmaceutical industry and in particular medical reps who try and sell drugs to doctors. And the start of the Viagra craze is always a fascinating thing to relive. I think the film handled that part very well. As for the second half, while the laughs died out quickly, I did find myself unexpectedly moved by the story and the emotions of the characters.
So yeah, I enjoyed it.
3.75 stars out of 5
Burlesque (2010)
Mmm…Cher once won an Oscar, and let’s face it, Christina Aguilera never will. And it won a Golden Globe (a pre-cursor to the Oscars) for Best Original Song. Oh, and Cher got a Razzie (the opposite of the Oscars) nomination for it this year!
Using the typical ‘small town girl in big city’ template, Burlesque follows Christina as she finds herself working in a burlesque bar (called ‘Burlesque’) where she’s just waiting to be discovered. Cher is the owner, Kristen Bell is the rival, Eric Dane is the tempter, and Cam Gigandet is the potential love interest. Fill in the blanks yourself and toss in a bunch of musical song and dance numbers from Christina and Cher, and that’s the movie in a nutshell.
Is it horrible? No. I actually expected a lot less, though I would have preferred it if they just went along for the ride and not taken themselves so seriously (because the unintended effect is quite comical). At the end of the day, Burlesque is a Christina vehicle, and it certainly shows off her spectacular voice and not-too-shabby acting abilities. It’s campy, musical and melodramatic, just as you would expect it to be. And while it’s certainly nothing special, it is better than the Britney equivalent (Crossroads).
2.5 stars out of 5
Pre-Oscars Movie Blitz (Best Picture) February 28, 2011
Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews, Reviews.Tags: 127 Hours, Academy Award, Annette Bening, Best Picture, Best Picture Nominees, Danny Boyle, James Franco, Jennifer Lawrence, John Hawkes, Julianne Moore, Kids Are All Right, Mark Ruffalo, Oscars, The Kids Are All Right, Winter's Bone
1 comment so far
The Academy Awards are upon us once again, and this year I vowed to watch all the Best Picture nominees before the ceremony. With the list of nominees extended to 10 for the second straight year, this was more difficult than I had anticipated. Fortunately, I had seen most of them already, so there were only three outstanding: Winter’s Bone, The Kids Are All Right, and 127 Hours.
Here goes!
Winter’s Bone (2010)
There’s usually one powerful independent film in the Best Picture mix and this year it’s Winter’s Bone, which has gotten rave reviews from just about every respectable critic out there.
The story feels complex but it’s actually very simple. In an extremely poor rural area, a meth cooker has disappeared while out on bail and his daughter Ree Dolly (Jennifer Lawrence) is looking for him — she has to, because she has two young siblings and a catatonic mother, and their house is collateral for the bail. But the more Ree snoops around the family business, the more trouble she gets into.
I suppose I would call it a gritty drama-thriller. A slow burn with moments of genuine suspense and horror. It’s the perfect example of a well-made indie film — low budget but compelling and well-acted — but I’m not sure I would put it in my top 10 list for the year (and hence Best Picture nominee).
My problem with it is that it rarely gets out of first gear, and all the mumbling makes some of the conversations difficult to decipher. That said, I was intrigued even through all the slow bits, and it was a very bleak and harrowing depiction of rural meth country.
Nevertheless, this film will likely make Jennifer Lawrence (nominated for Best Actress) a big star (she’s already nabbed the role of young Mystique in X-Men: First Class, and had an Esquire photo shoot that was rumoured to be the source of many ‘Winter’s Boners’). It was a knockout performance, subtle and utterly believable. Her co-star John Hawkes (also nominated, for Best Supporting Actor), was also very good.
Overall, a very good film, an excellent indie film, but perhaps because of the lofty expectations I came away slightly disappointed.
3.75 stars out of 5
The Kids Are All Right (2010)
I had no idea what this film was about before I saw it and I didn’t really care — it just didn’t look like the type of film I was interested in. But it’s a Best Picture nominee so I forced myself, and came out pleasantly surprised.
If there’s one movie I would compare The Kids Are All Right to (in terms of style and feel), it would have to be American Beauty. It’s one of those quirky dramas about suburban life in America, with genuine dramatic elements but also plenty of witty laughs and awkward moments.
Without giving away too much, it’s about a lesbian couple (Annette Bening and Julianne Moore), their kids (Mia Wasikowska (Alice in Wonderland) and Josh Hutcherson) and the sperm donor (Mark Ruffalo). As usual, the less known the better.
I would say this is a borderline deserving Best Picture nominee if we’re talking about a list of 10 (which is still pretty darn good in a relatively strong year). It had a fabulous script with terrific dialogue that’s amusing while remaining strangely realistic, plus killer performances by all involved. The standout for me was Mark Ruffalo (Best Supporting Actor nominee), who was just such a fantastic character.
Even though I wouldn’t consider this a classic or a particularly memorable film, I still really enjoyed it.
4 stars out of 5
127 Hours (2010)
I was vary wary of watching 127 Hours, and it’s not just because of the gruesomeness most viewers knew they were about to encounter. It’s because it’s a story where it’s predominantly one guy in one place (think Buried, which a lot of people loathed) and you knew exactly what was going to happen at the end because it’s a true story.
But my concerns were absolutely unfounded. 127 Hours is hands down one of the best films of 2010 and a deserving Best Picture nominee (even if there were just five instead of 10). Full credit to Danny Boyle (who won for Slumdog Millionaire a couple of years ago) for overcoming all the obstacles I thought this film would have and delivering such an emotionally involving, jubilant, triumphant motion picture.
Just in case you’re one of the three people on earth who don’t know the story of Aron Ralston (James Franco), I won’t say much. I just wonder how I would have received the film had I not known about his amazing story, but the impressive thing is that I was still completely absorbed by the film despite that dreaded feeling of inevitability.
I thought there was going to be a lot of extended flashback sequences, but to Boyle’s credit, there were surprisingly few. Some clever use of sound and sporadic dream sequences pushed the plot right along and kept it interesting and eventful for the entire 94 minute running time.
Of course, you can’t talk about this film without mentioning the ‘masterful’ performance from James Franco (a strange word for the guy from Pineapple Express), who has become one of my favorite actors. Is there anyone in Hollywood more affable than him right now? Who else could have carried a film like this from start to finish? It’s a shame he’s going up against virtual lock Colin Firth this year.
I loved this film and can’t believe I passed up two advanced screening opportunities last month. If I redo my Top 10 Films of 2010 this would probably be in the top 5.
4.5 out of 10!
Related Articles
- ‘King’s Speech’ battles ‘Social Network’ at the 83rd Oscars – CNN (news.google.com)
- Agree to Disagree’s Oscar Picks (and Hopefuls) for 83rd Annual Academy Awards (agreetodisagree.me)
- 2011 Best Picture Nominees (themediaexperiment.wordpress.com)
Movie Review: True Grit (2010) February 8, 2011
Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews, Reviews.Tags: Academy Awards, Best Picture, Charles Portis, Coen brothers, Ethan Coen, Hailee Steinfeld, Jeff Bridges, Joel Coen, John Wayne, Josh Brolin, Matt Damon, No Country for Old Men, Oscars, True Grit, True Grit 2010, True Grit review
1 comment so far
They say remakes seldom better the original, but it’s hard to imagine the 1969 John Wayne classic (which I haven’t seen) being better than the new version from my favourite filmmaking duo. True Grit is vintage Coen Brothers, more No Country For Old Men than The Big Lebowski but still funny and quirky. And when it comes to dialogue, human interactions and suspense, few can compare with Joel and Ethan Coen.
Based on Charles Portis’s 1968 novel of the same name, this version of True Grit is supposedly truer to the original source. It tells the story of young Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld), a wise-beyond-her-years 14-year-old who seeks to avenge the death of her father by tracking down and killing Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin). To do so, she seeks the assistance of Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges), a merciless but drunk and out-of-shape Deputy US Marshal. Tagging along for the ride is Texas Ranger LaBoeuf (Matt Damon), who is chasing Chaney for an unrelated crime.
I’m not usually a fan of Westerns, but True Grit had me hooked from the beginning. It moves with at a pace similar to No Country, which might be on the slow side for some, but whichever way you look at this film — whether it’s the screenplay, the performances or the direction — it’s top notch. And all through out was that trademark Coen Brothers touch, that unexpected, random hilarity that I can never get enough of.
Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon were expectedly excellent (as were Josh Brolin and Barry Pepper in smaller roles), but it was the remarkable performance of young Hailee Steinfeld that carried the film from start to finish. Good to see that she received an Oscar nomination, but how it was for Best Supporting Actress as opposed to Best Actress (considering she was in just about every scene) beats the hell out of me.
My only complaint was that it felt like the film needed subtitles at times because of the excessive mumbling (mostly by Jeff Bridges) which made the conversations difficult to follow. But apart from that, an awesome experience.
4.25 stars out of 5