Too bad for Li Na and Andy Murray! January 31, 2011Posted by pacejmiller in Sport, Tennis.
Tags: 2011, Andy Murray, Australian Open, Australian Open 2011, Australian Open Final, Grand Slams, Kim Clijsters, Li Na, Lleyton Hewitt, Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer
What a fantastic weekend of sports. I’ll start off with the biggest news — the Australian Open.
I’m not much of a tennis player (the fact that I won two consecutive ‘Most Improved Player’ awards at school and still suck says it all) but I do love watching it, especially the Grand Slams. Unfortunately, both players I was rooting for lost.
In the women’s, Belgian Kim Clijsters beat the sentimental favourite, China’s Li Na in three thrilling sets (3-6, 6-3, 6-3) to claim her first Australian Open title and her fourth GS title. As a friend of mine told me recently, GS finals usually disappoint, but this one really didn’t.
Clijsters has long endeared herself to Australians and earned the nickname “Aussie Kim” because she once dated Lleyton Hewitt (when he was the world’s top player and did toilet paper ads on TV) — and managed to keep that nickname long after they broke up because she actually wins (kinda like how Russell Crowe is Australian when he wins Oscars and a New Zealander when he throws phones).
Li Na is also a fascinating story because she’s the best tennis player China has ever seen and will probably inspire a whole new generation of Chinese tennis players. She’s funny and charismatic too, which is a bonus. At 28, Li is probably heading towards the twilight of her career, but the current world no. 7 is certainly not done yet. She had actually defeated Clijsters in a tournament just before the Australian Open and won the first set of the final in dramatic fashion. However, in the end Clijster’s poise and experience guided her to victory.
I would have loved to have seen Li take out the trophy because it would have been quite historical, and more importantly, I find it extremely embarrassing that Aussies latch on to “Aussie Kim” simply because she’s a winner. But then again, when the media makes a big fuss because Bernard Tomic didn’t get completely wiped off the court by Rafael Nadal (well, it was in straight sets), I guess they do need someone to root for.
It was great to finally see a GS final that didn’t involve Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal (as much as I admire both men).
But this was an intriguing matchup. Novak Djokovic was searching for his second GS trophy (having won the Aussie in 2008) and Andy Murray was looking for his first (having lost two finals to Federer before, including last year’s Aussie final). The two came up the ranks together as juniors and have been friends forever. With Federer declining and Nadal a potential timebomb because of injury concerns, this was the perfect opportunity for one of them to step up.
My wife dislikes Djokovic because, let’s face it, he looks like and sometimes acts like a bit of a dick. But I actually quite like him and thought he has embraced the occasional villain role quite well. And he’s one heck of a player too.
However, on this occasion I was definitely going for Murray. I felt sorry for the guy after he lost to Federer twice in previous finals, despite being a legitimate chance in both matches. He, like Tim Henman before him, must have been feeling the pressure of all of Great Britain on his shoulders, so I wanted him to finally relieve that tension. Besides, he’s too good of a player to never win a GS.
But this one turned out to be competitive but one sided. Perhaps it was the experience from winning one before, but Djokovic just seemed so much more comfortable than Murray, who served poorly and failed to execute the big shots. Luck certainly played a part in it — Djokovic’s shots were landing on the line and Murray’s were hitting the net. In the end it just wasn’t Murray’s day (6-4, 6-2, 6-3), and it looks like that perpetually frustrated, constipated look on his face will live on for yet another GS tournament.
Nevertheless, a good start to 2011 and a great end to the week!
PS: I wouldn’t feel too sorry for either loser though. The winner took home AUD 2.2 million while the loser got AUD 1.1 million.