jump to navigation

The Haunting in Connecticut – Fact or Fiction? April 10, 2009

Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews, Paranormal.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Just how much of it is true?

Yesterday I watched the ‘based on the true story’ film The Haunting in Connecticut.

First, a short review

To be honest, despite the poor reviews the film was received, it wasn’t all that bad.  It was just average, and for a supernatural horror film, ‘average’ is pretty good these days.  In my opinion, it was one of those rare horror films that actually got better as it progressed.  In the first half or so, the attempted scares were your stock standard ‘boo’ moments and the bloody, visceral shocks you’d expect to see in any regular PG-13 horror.  I don’t know why, but for some reason I found myself actually frightened a few times in the second half, and that’s a rarity for me nowadays.  I even forgot how insanely and ridiculously stupid and non-sensical (even within the confines of the film’s own logic) everything was.  And for that,  3 out of 5 stars!

Fact or Fiction?

After I got home, I started wondering just how much of the film was really ‘based’ on the true story?  Was it even a true story to begin with?  Which characters existed and what parts of the film actually happened in real life?

And so I turned to the trusty old Internets for some answers.  The results were…interesting.

(Read the rest of the true story by clicking on ‘More…’!)

The film is ‘based’ on supposedly true events that occured to the Snedeker family in 1986 when they moved into a house that turned out to be a former funeral home.  Naturally, spooky stuff started happening.  Their oldest son, who was 13 at the time and being treated for Hodgkin’s disease (the ‘Matt Campbell’ character from the movie) started behaving strangely and their 17-year old niece said she was fondled by unseen hands.  The mother, Carmen Snedeker (the ‘Sarah Campbell’ character from the movie), also claimed to be the victim of demonic sexual assaults.  There were many other alleged disturbances (such as water to blood, putrid odours, crucifixes going haywire or disappearing etc) but these were the most serious.

Eventually, Carmen Snedeker brought in Ed and Lorraine Warren, the infamous old ghostbusting couple that covered the ‘Amityville Horror’ haunting.  The Warren’s nephew, John Zaffis, also joined in for observations.  They became convinced that the house was haunted by demons.  A Catholic priest was brought in and the spirits were exorcised, and things went back to normal after that.  The Snedekers left two and a half years after they moved in.

With help from the Warrens, the Snedekers’ story was first brought to light by the book In a Dark Place: The Story of a True Haunting by Ray Garton, a horror fiction writer, and was also the subject of an episode of the TV show A Haunting titled A Haunting in Connecticut.  From what I’ve read about the book and the TV show, both were incredibly frightening.


I wanted to know how credible the true story behind the movie was, so I dug a little further.

What John Zaffis said

John Zaffis is the nephew of the Warrens that were brought in by the Snedeker’s for help. Here is the full article he wrote about the Snedekers and their funeral home house.

In short, he discusses some of the background and events detailed in In a Dark Place and talks about his own experiences in the house.  Here’s an extract:

This is the case where I had my first encounter with a full formed demon and it is something to this day that I will never forget. I was sitting at the dining room table when it started to get ice cold in the room, at this point I knew something was getting ready to happen. I tried to get the other researchers or family members to respond to me by calling out to them but they did not. I knew at this point this was meant for me to experience alone. I had gotten up and walked into the hallway and looked up at the top of the stairs, I began to smell something like rotting meat which was all over this area and it was unbearable. As I continued to look up the grand staircase, I started to see something begin to form, as it slowly descended down the staircase. It was the ugliest thing I had ever seen, it had come to the last step on the staircase and it said to me “do you know what they did to us, do you know”? That was enough for me, I left the home and did not return for three days. I do not think I’ve ever encountered anything that has scared me as bad as that, I would not speak to anyone for days after the encounter, but I did go back to work on the case, the family needed our help.

Sounds pretty scary, right?

What Chip Coffey said

Chip Coffey is a self-proclaimed ‘psychic, medium, spiritual counselor and paranormal investigator’ who became involved with the Snedekers when the TV show was made. Here’s his blogger site.

Coffey also wrote an article about the haunting in Connecticut titled ‘Demons from the dark’ which mirrored a lot of the things said in Zaffis’s article. Here it is anyway.

Carmen Snedeker’s website

Carmen Snedeker is still around and she has her own website, which was surprisingly difficult to find. Follow this link to visit the page.

I must say, had I only seen Zaffis’s and Coffey’s articles, I would have found it all pretty convincing (maybe not convinced, but it would have been convincing).  But Carmen’s website smells funny – from the smiling ‘star-shot’ portrait to the shameless promotion of herself, advertising for supernatural investigators (including Zaffis), her touring lectures about the hauntings and (here’s the clincher) the brand new book on the haunting she is working on with Zaffis and Coffey!  Now they don’t sound so convincing anymore.

Carmen also mentions the feature film, which she believes “will bring a new understanding of what went on in the house”.  Clearly she had no idea of what the Hollywood producers had in mind.


From Carmen’s website, the Snedekers’ story began to completely fall apart.

What Garton said about his own book

From first publication of In a Dark Place, author Ray Garton has been savaging his own ‘non-fiction’ book and the Warrens.  I’ve found numerous examples of him condeming what he wrote as, effectively, made up.  By him.  Fiction.

Probably the most complete account comes from his interview at Horror Bound Magazine (see entire interview here – worth a read because it’s quite funny and interesting – and has some good advice for aspiring writers at the end):

You’ve written both fiction and non-fiction. In one case in particular, a book that was labeled “non-fiction” should have been labeled “fiction” (through no fault of your own). For those Horror Bound readers who have a huge interest in the paranormal and who have followed the careers of Ed and Lorraine, what would you say?

Ah, the Warrens. Ed, of course, has gone to that great haunted house in the sky, but Lorraine is still around. Back in the early ‘90s, I was offered a chance to write a book for Ed and Lorraine. As a kid, I used to follow their ghost-hunting exploits in the National Enquirer. I thought it sounded like a fun job, so I took it. I went to Connecticut and spent time with the Snedeker family. They’d moved into a house with their sick son and learned the place used to be a funeral home. They claimed all kinds of spooky things had happened in the house. They’d called in Ed and Lorraine, and after investigating, the Warrens announced that the house was infested with demons. Some of these demons had anally raped members of the family.

A little aside here. Back when I was reading about the Warrens, they were ghost hunters. Every house they investigated had at least one ghost, and there was always a spooky story behind it. But after The Exorcist was so wildly popular, first as a novel and then as a movie, Ed and Lorraine stopped encountering ghosts and began to uncover demon infestations. And it seems that wherever they went, people were being sexually molested by demons. Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

Carmen Snedeker was an unemployed wife and mother who was running an illegal interstate lottery business, about which she asked me numerous times to tell no one. I never met the son, who was said to be ill, although I was allowed to talk to him on the phone once, supervised by Carmen. When the boy began to talk about drugs and told me that he didn’t hear and see strange things in the house once he began taking medication, Carmen ended the conversation. As I gathered all the necessary information for the book, I found that the accounts of the individual Snedekers didn’t quite mesh. They just couldn’t keep their stories straight. I went to Ed with this problem. “Oh, they’re crazy,” he said. “Everybody who comes to us is crazy. Otherwise why would they come to us? You’ve got some of the story – just use what works and make the rest up. And make it scary. You write scary books, right? That’s why we hired you. So just make it up and make it scary.” I didn’t like that one bit. But by then, I’d signed the contract and there was no going back. I did as Ed instructed – I used what I could, made up the rest, and tried to make it as scary as I could. The book was called In A Dark Place: The Story of a True Haunting.

As soon as it was published, I started telling my story, knowing full well that it would not be too popular with the Snedekers or the Warrens. I was right. Carmen Snedeker, now Carmen Reed, has denounced the book. She claims they had little involvement in it, which is a lie. Since the release of that book, the Discovery Channel has aired a “re-enactment” of the story called A Haunting in Connecticut, which, of course, presents the Snedekers’ story as hard cold fact. Now a feature film based on the story is going to be released soon called The Haunting in Connecticut. I suspect the movie will begin with the words “Based on a true story.” Be warned: Just about anything that begins with any variation of this phrase is trying a little too hard to convince you of something that probably isn’t true. Last I heard, Carmen is working on a new book, to tell the real story – apparently they’ve settled on one. I don’t know if Carmen runs her little interstate lottery operation anymore, but now she’s claiming to be some kind of psychic healer. She says she’s always been a psychic healer, although I didn’t hear anything about it in Connecticut back in the early ‘90s.

These days, John Zaffis is the “investigator” being used to make this cockamamie tale look like something remotely resembling legitimate. Zaffis is the nephew of Ed and Lorraine Warren. He was around back when I was working on the book. He didn’t do much, just stood around. Lorraine told me he was learning the business. He told me a story about something he saw in the former funeral home – some kind of “fully formed demon,” or some such nonsense.

During my stay in Connecticut, Ed, Lorraine, and Zaffis repeatedly told me they had videotape of supernatural activity they’d shot in the demon-infested former funeral home (which I never visited because the current owners claimed the Snedekers were full of it and wanted nothing to do with the Warrens’ little dog and pony show). They assured me I would see that footage. Throughout my visit, they kept telling me the videotape was coming, that they were having trouble finding it, but they’d show it to me. By the end of my visit, there had been no sign of any videotape. After my experience with the Warrens, I talked to a couple of other writers who’d written books for Ed and Lorraine – and their stories were nearly identical to mine.

I found another message board thread on dejanews where Garton posted, and he had the following things to say about the Warrens:

I spent several days with the Warrens during that time.  I spent time with them in their home and ate with them and went on long drives with them.  Of the two, Lorraine is the sanest.  She’s an “enabler”.  Years ago, before their career in the “supernatural” began, Ed suffered from mental illness.  It was bad enough to keep him from working, and the only way he could make money was to hand paint haunted houses on dinnerplates and sell them door to door.  Once Ed decided that Lorraine was “psychic”, selling the haunted house plates eventually led to “investigating” haunted houses.  At first, they found “ghosts”.  But after the tremendous success of THE EXORCIST — both the novel and the movie — ghosts suddenly became demons.  If you go back and trace their career, you can see the sudden change.  Almost overnight, all ghosts were really demons trying to possess residents, and sooner or later, the demons anally raped someone. It never fails, every damned time, the Warrens’ demons bend somebody over a bed or a sink and beat down the back door, if you know what I mean.  From my time spent with the Warrens, I learned from Ed that their job is not really to “investigate” so much as it is to take the stories told by these families — most of whom are dealing with REAL problems like alcoholism, drug addiction, mental illness, and/or domestic abuse, problems that are buried by their supernatural fantasies, which are supported and made tangible by the very eager Warrens — and arrange them into a saleable package that will make a good book, and hopefully a movie.

Not only are the Warrens frauds, not only do they give a bad name to people who are SERIOUSLY investigating paranormal phenomena, I think they’re EVIL because of the way they exploit families already deep in despair and ready to shatter. I can ignore a simple con job … but the Warrens are actually damaging people who are already damaged, who are desperate and vulnerable, using them for the sake of a book, maybe a lucrative movie sale, or another story to add to their traveling dog and pony show.  Before I worked on that book, I’d followed the adventures of Ed and Lorraine Warren faithfully since I was a little boy.  I was excited to work with them.  Boy, was that a big disappointment.  It’s nice to believe there’s a smiling, grandparently couple out there chasing demons … but not when you know they’re hurting people for the sake of publicity and the almighty dollar.
What investigative journalist Joe Nickell found
Skeptical paranormal investigator Joe Nickell wrote a very insightful article entitled ‘Demons in Connecticut’. The article can be found here.
In it, Nickell discusses the background of the Snedeker family and why he thinks it was all made up for media exploitation.  It’s particularly interesting because Nickell was actively involved in trying to debunk the story when it first came to light and was being discussed on talk shows.  There are plenty of quotes from people who lived around the Snedekers who claim it’s all fake, and suggestions of how some of the paranormal activities could be rationally explained.

Concluding thoughts – so what actually happened?

After reading Garton and Nickell, I was ready to write the whole Snedeker haunting off as shameless attention-seeking and media exploitation.  But then I came across this message board, where two posters (brothers) claimed to have lived in the house after the Snedekers. Well, the problem is that their identities can’t be verified, but what they’ve written seems genuine enough.  And according to them, the house was definitely haunted, just not to the extent grossly exaggerated by the Snedekers.  There were voices, loud footsteps, swinging doors – but that was about it.

As someone who believes in ghosts, a former funeral home would be a prime candidate for a haunting.  And as someone who has done a fair bit of reading on ghosts, I understand that different people have different sensitivities to these types of things.  Further, people who are fit and healthy are less likely to experience things than people who are ill.  So it is possible that the house was haunted, and perhaps the Snedekers, with their sick son and multitude of problems, experienced more of it than other people.  But just about everything else points to shameless exploitation for a bit of money.

My guess is that there were probably a few spooky things that happened at the house (paranormal or not), but nothing as dramatic as they claim (and certainly none of the crap in the movie).  But when the Warrens got involved, things just spiralled out of control and it became nothing more than a money-making venture.  Assume you believe in ghosts for a minute – okay, it’s a funeral home, lots of dead bodies, so maybe a lost soul here or there – but why all these raging demons who like to molest people?  In real life (unlike in the film) there were no explanations offered, no dark history of torture or mutilation uncovered, no ancient burial ground or corpses in the cellar.

And come on, if you had something as terrifying as demons trying to anally rape you, would you stay in the house for another second?  I don’t care if you don’t have another dime in the bank – you wouldn’t just keep the lights on and go back to bed!


Read on if you have seen the film or don’t plan on seeing it.

After looking into the facts behind the story, it seems there were only a few similarities between the film and the true story on which it was based.  We know that a family did move into a house that was formerly a funeral home, and they did it to be closer to the treatment facility for their son, who was suffering from cancer (Hodgkin’s disease).  We also know that the son did undergo some drastic changes in personality, and he would eventually recover, but he was probably nowhere near death as suggested in the film.  There were probably some alcohol and financial problems too.

Apart from that, just about everything else was different.  The Snedekers had 3 sons (aged 13, 11 and 3) and a 6-year old daughter.  2 nieces would move in with them later.  There was another tenant living upstairs.  Most significantly, there was no elaborate back story about a young medium boy who conducted seances, no stolen graves, no dead bodies stashed away in the basement, no dying reverend who happens to know everything, no carvings on the body, no box of human eyelids hidden under the floorboards, and certainly no burning down of the house.

As for the ghosts and paranormal events that happened in the house, only a few people know the truth, but the one thing we know for sure is that they were nothing like what was depicted in the movie.  ‘Based on the true story’?  Hardly.  Maybe more appropriate would be: ‘Inspired by events that may or may not have happened’ – but I guess that doesn’t have quite the same ring to it.


1. theninthdragonking - April 11, 2009

Hey Pace, that was some extensive research! Wow! I don’t think I would have been able to find all of that, pretty awesome. Funny, I also posted about the movie about a week ago and my feelings about the film were on par with yours: nothing great but at least a bit different from your average Hollywood-horror-crap. Cool to get all, and I mean all, the facts behind the story. Well done.

pacejmiller - April 11, 2009

Hey, thanks mate. Yeah that’s my biggest problem – I start with an idea then I just go out of control. What’s intended as a short post almost always ends up a thesis. It’s wasting too much of my time. I’m just glad people other than me are reading it! I saw your comments about the film on your blog, by the way, good stuff. I’m starting to wonder whether I gave the film too much credit, actually, but I’m going to stick with the rating.

2. theninthdragonking - April 11, 2009

Yeah tell me about it. I would say that 98% of my posts are longer than I would like them to be, and I do try to be concise but it just never happens. I reconcile myself with the thought that if I’m passionate about something–even if I don’t like the subject–then I must say what I have to say, short posts be damned. After all, It’s a blog about writing, and writing equals reading. If people don’t wanna read then they can look elsewhere right? If anyting I’m also providing images and video so there can be that much complaining, hehe.

3. Alexander Field - April 12, 2009

I just have to say that this poster is immediately striking…and I may have to check out this film based on your comments alone. We’ll see. Thanks for the in depth review!

pacejmiller - April 12, 2009

Thanks – I wouldn’t get your hopes up too much about the movie though! The more I think about it the more I feel I may have been too generous. Also, what happens in the poster has nothing to do with what happened in real life – that thing is supposed to be ectoplasm, which I think is pretty cool but it didn’t really have much to do with anything in the movie other than for the ‘whoa what is that?’ effect.

4. John - August 21, 2009

Thanks for taking the time to do this. After seeing the film it begs to question are all those dead bodies there in real life? After doing some research I found pieces and bits but mostly reviews. Then I stumbled upon your post which I believe to be accurate. I just wanted to say, thanks for putting it together to answer pretty much all the questions I had. I too enjoyed the movie but would really have enjoyed it better had it just been fiction. I really didn’t like wondering in the back of my mind which part is true. As it turns out ever time I wondered, that pretty much was the untrue part. Anyhow, thanks for putting this together. John.

5. Beth - October 13, 2009

i just watched the movie on dvd. i really liked it but it didn’t have enough detail for me. I really want to know what the bodies said. i know the guy must of written on them for some one to read, not just being he was psycho. so if anyone knows where i can find it. i would love to read it. thanks beth

pacejmiller - October 13, 2009

My strong feeling is that all that stuff was made up to make the movie more scary and shocking. I doubt any of it came close to being what happened in real life.

6. uioae - April 14, 2010

There Should be a simple thumbs up button for people who liked it and want to give encouragement without comments. Good work.

7. Aishz - September 12, 2010

Just finished the movie and jumped on trusty google to see if it was true or not! Came across your site you were really thorough with your synopsis and showed every angle and had me in stitches with some of the finishes! Lol still on the quest for a true hunting story :)! When you find one do forward :)!

pacejmiller - September 12, 2010

Well, when I was much younger I remember we hired this video called “The Haunted”, which was a 1991 made-for-TV movie about the Smurl family. It scared the crap out of me and all this time I was convinced the story was real (they certainly made it seem that way). The film is on YouTube if you want to check it out. Or if you want to read up: http://www.angelfire.com/sc/TruthDirectory/smurlhaunting.html

Anyway, I had always believed it was entirely real until I just checked it up and saw that the Warrens were involved. Oh well…

8. Rocky_B - September 27, 2010

Nicely done, & thanks for the links. Followed them & found them quite interesting.

Are the Warners frauds? IMHO being outed by a author tricked under contract into becoming a co-conspirator, who immediately following the scam exposing them at great risk of compromising his own credibility in an attempt to rescue his personal integrity is very convincing testimony. Sadly, if they were con artists & frauds, it also places a spotlight on others they “professionally” associated with in the psychic investigation field and everyone they associated. For example, Hans Holder, a prolific writer on haunting investigations who used the Warners, Sylvia Browne, and many other self-proclaimed psychics in his research.

The proliferation of con artists in the genra transfers unwarrented bad reputations on ALL who may truly be gifted psychics by making them all seem as hokey as snake oil salesmen. And makes it readily apparent why many of the new TV haunting investigation shows no popular avoid self-proclaimed psychics as if they were pariahas. This is unfortunate as there really are gifted psychics, divinators, and spiritualists in the real world whom are not in it for the money or fame. Many would gladly volunteer to participate in scientific investigations experiments and studies to try to help restore the damage done by Charletons like the Warners.

My own family has had it’s own encounters with the paranormal, and some chilling events and places that freaked us out, yet never once gave a thought to of calling anyone in to disrupt and meddle with our our lifes. Many of those moments were much too personal to take outside of the family, such as those involving psychic encounters of shared emotional bond with a validated passed love one and involved no outside self-proclaimed psychics. You see, a few of our family members have minor abilities, yet not a one of us would think of charging a cent for any such service and only use it amongst family or small circles of intimate friends. Most everyone else is unaware of that side of our family, and even some family members are excluded from knowing. I am an identical twin and we’ve had our own strange occurances, from twinspeak-to-syncronistic taking up and finishing each other’s statements-to-unexplained pain transference (which often prompted long-distance calls to find out what the hell was going on with the other twin), We just though it was funny how natural it all seemed to us & how creeped out others would get over it.

I think one can pretty easly discount the forum posters you mentioned as nothing more than one (or more) attention seeker(s) or a troll/trolls setting out hoax bait to see if there were any takers. The first mistake they made was the year they claimed they lived in the same house (1987), which was impossible as the Snedekers and their Landlady both agree only on the fact that they moved into the home in 1986 and were there for at least a little over two years. Another point that suggests it was a troll is neither poster registered on the site to post. This is a lame, typical troll method so they can continue to post pretending to be others supporting their previous posts. Note the second even longer “sibling” post occurs 1 hour ten minutes after the original post and also uses the CAPS LOCK to stress words, which the first poster started doing near the end rather than using quotation marks as they he did initially. Apparently they were monitoring to see if anyone would take the bait before reposting They claim that there was nobody living upstairs in 1987 and they would hear voices and investigate, yet the Landlady notes that there was an upstairs neighbor whom frequently commented on the Snedeckers during that time frame. Then the claim of the front door, which presumably would remain locked if it was never used the entire time they were there (yeah right), “FLYING” open all the time also sounds a bit too contrived.

9. Emma GreenWood - April 17, 2011

i have a very scary basement. and after i saw the hautning in conneticate, my basement walls started to crack open. im so freaked and i have no idea what to do. i have to go down there every day to let my dogs out of their cages. how do i know if my basement is hautned??? am i thinking about it to much ._.?

pacejmiller - April 17, 2011

You mean they started to crack right in front of you?? That’s freaky. And you keep your dogs in a cage? Also freaky.

10. Shania - August 21, 2011

My Sisters Friends Family Live Up In Connecticut & The Family That Was Alive When That Place Was A Funeral Home Even Said That They Saw Dead Bodies Being Tooken Into The House And Reports Of Missing Corpses

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: