jump to navigation

Pacers improving on D…give up 135 to Magic January 28, 2009

Posted by pacejmiller in Basketball, Indiana Pacers.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
trackback
Pacers lose again

The looks say it all

Okay, so I expected to see a loss against the Orlando Magic today.  But to give up 135 points after all the recent chatter (courtesy of the ultimate spin website pacers.com) of how a significantly improved defense has led to the Pacers’ recent “run” of 4 wins in 6 games…it has just left me speechless.

The final score was 135-111.  Mickael Pietrus top-scored with 27 points in his first game back from injury.  I knew the Pacers were in for a tough time because Howard’s a monster and the Pacers are admittedly thin in the middle – “stick skinny” Jeff Foster, “super slow-mo” Nesterovic, “human foul machine” Roy Hibbert and “the guy who’s slightly better than Luke Ridnour (the guy who can’t guard a chair)” Troy Murphy.  But Dwight only had a semi-decent game with 22 points, 10 boards and 6 turnovers, and they only needed his services for 29 minutes.  No excuses.

The majority of games coming up are against weak teams, but this blowout loss does not infuse me with confidence that they’ll roll through their opponents.  He’s lucky the voting has closed, but Danny Granger dealt a serious blow to his All-Star credibility by scoring only 10 points on 4 of 14 shooting (I’ve lost count how many bad shooting nights he’s had in a row now), just a day or so before the All-Star reserves are announced.  The saving grace is that it seems TJ Ford (who returned to the starting line-up and led the way with 23 points) and Marquis Daniels (who added 16 off the bench) are finally healthy again.

Next up in this back-to-back is injury-depleted Milwaukee, who just lost Michael Redd for the rest of the season.  Let’s see if the Pacers can bounce back and not only win, but hold their opponents down below 100 points.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Matthew Ho - January 28, 2009

i’m currently checking out the boxscore as i write this.

the pacers have a good cornerstone to build around with Granger. it’s going to be a while before they are competitive. Now if we could combine the pacers and the bulls, we’d have a playoff team.

i saw the best comment about Troy Murphy on fantasy bball article. “He’s a good player if you consider him as a rebounding guard” LOL isn’t he the starting PF/centre for the pacers!!?!

the magic are too balanced for the pacers. In fact, other than Granger, there’s nothing i like about the pacers. their lineup looks so weak….you’ve got jarret jack as the starting 2!!!!!

pacejmiller - January 28, 2009

LOL re Troy Murphy. The guy can shoot 3s and rebound, but he can’t defend. Neither can most of the rest of the team.

Okay, say you combine the best players on the Bulls and Pacers – what type of team would you get? Who would make the cut?

I’d say the starters would be:

PG: Rose; SG: Gordon; SF: Granger, PF: Gooden; C: Foster (struggled with this one – both sides have crap Cs)

7 reserves rounding out the rotation would be:

Deng, Dunleavy, TJ Ford, Larry Hughes, Murphy, Daniels, Heinrich

3 on the injured list: Nocioni, Jack, Tyrus Thomas

Man…that still doesn’t look like a very good team.

2. Matthew Ho - January 28, 2009

the team’s still weak in the middle, but i think there’s better overrall depth. but yes, the combined team still sucks.

i would hope that rose + granger would be enough to be competitive.

We’d have to trade half the rubbish on both teams for a big man.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: