jump to navigation

Movie Review: Zombieland (2009) December 6, 2009

Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
3 comments

If I had to sum up the zombie comedy Zombieland in five words, it would be “Pretty good but not great”.

Directed by Ruben Fleischer (no previous work worthy of noting), it has a premise we’ve seen a few times before – the country (America) being overtaken by zombies and an unlikely hero trying to survive against all odds.  That’s about as much as I want to give away.  As with most films, try and avoid the previews if you can.  Plenty of great scenes, lines and jokes were unnecessarily ruined by the previews I had the misfortune of coming across.  If I hadn’t seen them in advance I probably would have liked the film more.

What sets Zombieland apart from other zombie movies of late is that it is more comedy than horror, and what sets it apart from other zombie comedies is that it is actually pretty funny.  It’s definitely more Shaun of the Dead than 28 Days Later, but the laughs aren’t as silly or outrageous – not quite, anyway.  Much of the humour stems from the quirky character traits of, and the witty banter between, the two leads, played by Jesse Eisenberg (from Adventureland, who seems forever destined to battle Michael Cera for all the goofy, awkward boy roles) and Woody Harrelson (last seen by me in 2012, the movie not the year).  Rounding out the main quartet are Emma Stone (Jules from Superbad) and Abigail Breslin (My Sister’s Keeper, Little Miss Sunshine), who both put in solid performances without stealing the show.

Zombieland knows exactly what kind of movie it is trying to be.  Extremely gory (no shortage of over-the-top blood and guts), tongue-in-cheek, and nonchalant about the fact that the whole country (and probably world) has been overrun by zombies who just want to eat human flesh.  And yet, Zombieland does have charm and it does have heart, though it never steps over the line into melodrama as that would mean caring too much – and that would just be too uncool for a movie like this.

That said, Zombieland is far from perfect.  There are a number of slower bits strewn throughout the film, far more than there should be.  And while it is funny, not all the jokes hit the mark, and sometimes it even risks trying too hard to be amusing.  And of course, though it is technically a comedy/horror, the film is not particularly frightening.  The zombies are there more for the laughs than the chills, and you never get the sense that there is any real danger.

Weighing up all the pros and cons, I’d probably say Zombieland is a 3-star movie that is worth watching, but to be honest I wanted it to be much more than just a sweet, mildly enjoyable film.  However, there is a special surprise in Zombieland that is worth a whole half-star by itself – hands down the most unexpected, insane, hilarious cameo I’ve seen in…possibly ever!  Accordingly…

3.5 stars out of 5!

Review: Jason Alexander’s Comedy Spectacular! December 5, 2009

Posted by pacejmiller in Entertainment.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

George Costanza is back, baby!

In my humble opinion, George Costanza (Seinfeld) is the greatest sitcom character of all time.  And naturally, the actor that plays George, Jason Alexander, is my favourite sitcom actor (and probably TV actor) of all time.

And so when I found out that Jason Alexander’s Comedy Spectacular was returning to Sydney, I didn’t hesitate to buy tickets immediately.  The chance to see the closest thing I have to a hero was too rare an opportunity to pass up.  It didn’t matter to me that the description of the show stated that Alexander was ‘hosting’ a night of comedy, which made me slightly concerned that they were merely using his name to promote a show predominantly featuring other comics.

The verdict?  Pure gold! By far the best comedy night I have ever been to.

This was truly Jason Alexander’s Comedy Spectacular.  Alexander featured all the way through the 3-hour+ extravaganza, and he was in superb form from start to finish.  The show began with a hilarious long solo stand-up act from the man himself (much longer than I had expected).  It wasn’t just recycled material either – there were plenty of references to more recent events (from the death of Michael Jackson to Tiger Woods’ indiscretions to Australia’s new opposition leader to of course, the wedding between 66-year-old Geoffrey Edelsten and his 25 year-old-bride Brynne Gordon which Alexander was paid to attend) and was full of improvisation and spontaneity.

Following the solo act, Alexander began introducing a stellar cast of local comedians.  On this particular night, he had stand-ups Glenn Robbins, Mick Molloy and Julia Morris, music-comedy trio The Axis of Awesome, and improv specialist Rebecca de Unamano.  For those who know a little about Australian comedy, this is a formidable line-up.  Good enough to sell-out venues even without the headlining superstar.  Here’s a brief review of each of the secondary acts:

Glenn Robbins – by far the funniest comedian of the night not named Jason Alexander.  He started off a little slow, but was absolutely on fire before it was over and had the crowds rolling in the isles.

Mick Molloy – the fat lady beside me sounded like she was about to die from laughter, but Mick’s comedy really didn’t do it for me personally – though to be fair he had a couple of good one-liners.

Julia Morris – consistent, female-oriented comedy with some decent laughs, but nothing that made me piss myself.

Axis of Awesome – great talents, but compared to the experienced and polished comics, felt a little amateurish – that was, until their final song, which was a bloody masterpiece.

Rebecca de Unamano – great fun because she utilised Jason Alexander’s talents and got the rest of the cast involved – and not a bad comedian herself.

The greatest thing was that even though the night was split between various acts, it was well and truly Alexander’s show.  He was there from the beginning, he was by far the longest act, and he continued to throw in gut-busting lines and jokes (often at Michael Jackson’s expense) between the other acts.  My favourite parts of the show were (in no particular order):

  • the Q&A session with the crowd before the intermission, which largely circled around Seinfeld, of course.  We found out what Jerry Seinfeld said to the gang before they went out for the last episode, what Alexander’s favourite George Costanza line is, and we even saw Alexander sign the leg of some dude in front of me who had George Constanza’s face tattooed on his leg!  No joke;
  • Jason Alexander’s amazing Broadway musical medley to kick start the second half of the show; and
  • the improvisation session with the entire cast which finished up the night – Alexander was at his absolute best, even outdoing the master of improv Rebecuitca de Unamano.

All in all, it was indeed a comedy spectacular!  Highly recommended if you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to see it.

5 out of 5 stars!

Epic Fail: My NaNoWriMo Challenge December 4, 2009

Posted by pacejmiller in Blogging, Novel, On Writing.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

About a month ago I tried to attempt what many may have done before me – attempt NaNoWriMo without actually entering into NaNoWriMo.  That is, write 50,000 words on my work-in-progress fantasy novel in the month of November.

The verdict: epic fail.

Try 10,000 words (which, to be fair, is not that bad under the circumstances).  I tried, I really did.  But I just couldn’t find the time.  For most of the month, I was working 13-15 hour days, 5 days a week.  Travel time to and from work took up 1.5-2 hours per day.  Factor in 7-8 hours of sleep a night, keeping up with blog posts and needing almost the entire weekend to unwind and recover, that didn’t leave much time for writing.

Where does that leave me?  Two positives came out of this experience.  One, I progressed another 10,000 words on that first draft.  Two, and more importantly, I know for certain that if I ever want to finish this book, I need to find another job.  At this rate, it would probably take another 10 years, so it doesn’t really leave me much choice.

The good thing is that after yet another brutal week, I don’t feel like all hope is lost.  Even though I should be catching up on some much needed sleep, I ended up getting up earlier than usual because all I wanted to do was write.  That’s a good sign, isn’t it?

Danny Green KOs Roy Jones Jr in Round 1! December 3, 2009

Posted by pacejmiller in Boxing.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

I was all pumped to watch the highly anticipated showdown (in Australia anyway) between Danny Green and the ‘legendary’ Roy Jones Jr in Sydney on the night of 2 December 2009.  Unfortunately I was stuck at work until midnight, though fortunately I managed to find a forum that was providing live updates.

So I see a post about Roy’s gay ring entrance.  Great, I say, the fight’s about to start.  Next upload a couple of minutes later…WTF?  Roy Jones Jr just got KNOCKED OUT!  Round 1.  By Danny Green.  The Danny Green that was supposedly too slow, too methodical, too dumb.  It was the most shocking result I never expected to see.  A Danny Green win I could see.  A KO win, perhaps.  But Round 1?  You’re a liar if you say you saw that coming.

I felt terrible for the fans who waited on the edge of their seat all night through the crappy undercards and delays, and blah, all over in 122 seconds.  Great value for money.  On the other hand, I felt relieved that I didn’t make the trek down to watch the fight on the big screen, not when the fight was available on YouTube in its entirety shortly after it was all over.

Since then I have watched the fight about half a dozen times.  Here, you can too, thanks to YouTube.  It’ll only take a couple of minutes.

Is there much point in recapping or analysing?  Contrary to the opinion of Jones groupies who refuse to realise this is a 40-year-old man who has been brutally knocked out twice (and has never been the same since), Roy Jones Jr did not throw the fight.  He was, as always, cautious in the first round, but I think it was clear he wasn’t prepared for Green’s pressure.  In the 122 seconds the fight lasted, Jones only threw left jabs.  Not a single right hand, not a single left-handed power shot.  All he did was back up and jab.  It only took Green 30 seconds to corner him for the first time and land some decent punches.

And the overhand right that knocked Jones down (74 seconds in) and effectively ended the fight landed in virtually the exact same way and the exact same spot as Glen Johnson did back in September 2004 – right in the temple – except back then, Jones didn’t get up for more than 3 minutes.  They say once you get knocked out like that, you’re never the same, and that was Roy’s second consecutive brutal KO (the first coming in his previous fight against Antonio Tarver some 4 months earlier).  Maybe Jones has a glass head (ala his mate Anthony Mundine), but he has always dropped his left hand low.  Back in the day when he had unparalleled reflexes, he could get away with that, but at 40 years old, it became a massive opportunity for Danny Green.

The fight probably should have been stopped earlier when Green pounced on Jones immediately after the knockdown, where Jones was fed a steady diet of ripping shots without throwing back or even attempting to tie up his opponent.  But the referee allowed things to go on (perhaps not wanting to be criticised for ending things too quickly), and for a while, it almost looked like Jones was going to last the round.  So I suppose there is some merit in arguing that the referee stopped the fight prematurely, but when a fighter doesn’t do anything except get pounded against the ropes for almost a full minute and with 40 seconds still to go in the round, you can’t fault the referee for stepping in.

To be honest, few people around the world cared about this fight (which is why it happened in Australia, where the time zone ousted the majority of boxing fans in the US and Europe).  The people that did were probably already looking forward to the now-in-tatters, 17-years-in-the-making fight between Jones and Bernard Hopkins.  However, this didn’t stop the Australian media from billing this as the biggest fight the country had ever seen.  Sadly, it may have been true.

Jones got paid a reported $10 million for making the trip down under.  That’s $5 million per minute in the ring.  I’m sure he wanted to win, but I think he’s more disappointed about the fight with Hopkins going down the drain (as Hopkins won his ‘tune-up’ fight) than losing to Danny Green.

Where to now for both fighters?  I think there is a chance they Jones-Hopkins II could still go ahead.  When mega money is involved, anything can happen, and Hopkins has already been trying to talk down the loss.

Of course, Danny Green and his team think (erroneously) that they are now going to get the big bucks.  I don’t think so.  Yes, Jones will go down in history as one of the greatest of his era, but the win won’t open up the type of lucrative deals they think will start flooding in.  Not to say Green isn’t a solid fighter capable of beating the top fighters, but let’s put things in perspective.  Green was relatively unknown outside Australia before the fight, Jones was way past his prime, the fight took place in Australia, and most of all – Green just doesn’t have the requisite charisma or flashy style to be a superstar.  They are already talking about possibly going up to heavyweight to take on 147-year-old Evander Holyfield.  Seriously.

Movie Review: Up (2009) November 30, 2009

Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
7 comments

I’m not usually a big fan of animated films.  There have been a few very good ones (such as Toy Story, Shrek and Ratatouille), plenty of terrible ones (such as Shark Tale, Astro Boy and the worst of them all, Resident Evil: Degeneration), and a whole lot of average or overrated ones (in my opinion just about everything else, such as Finding Nemo and Happy Feet).

Accordingly, I approached the latest Pixar/Disney venture, Up, with plenty of scepticism.  I’m not going to discuss the plot – the poster is about as much background as you need.  Anyway, I ended up loving it.

For starters, Up is one of the funniest animated films I’ve ever seen.  It has that Toy Story quirkiness to it, that matter-of-fact approach to completely random and outrageous situations.  There are plenty of WTF? moments, but the execution is so sweet and cute that you can’t help but be captivated, regardless of how crazy it may all seem.

There’s also the wonderful characters – extremely unique characters.  Can you imagine any other film carried by a grumpy old man and a fat little Asian kid (plus a whole bunch of dogs) from start to finish?  Incredible.

Most of all, Up has plenty of heart.  The opening sequence summarising the life of old Carl Fredericksen up to that point is one of the most bittersweet and moving I’ve seen in any film.  And when he comes on board, the back story of Russell the kid is also very touching.  The balance between humour and drama and action is handled brilliantly, each hitting the spot at the crucial moments.

And did I mention the amazing animation?  The gorgeous blend of colours and crisp textures, coupled with the beautiful scenery and perfect character design, took the exuberance and warmth to a whole new level.

Granted, Up is not perfect – it started off wonderfully but dipped a little towards the middle before picking itself back up before the end, but on the whole it is hands down one of the best animated movies I’ve had the pleasure of watching.

4.5 stars out of 5!