Movie Review: New Moon (2009) November 23, 2009
Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews.Tags: Bella Swan, Eclipse, Edward Cullen, Jacob Black, Kristen Stewart, New Moon, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, Twilight, Twilight Saga, vampire
1 comment so far
New Moon, the second film of the Twilight Saga, is a solid sequel to a popular franchise. It will no doubt please its hardcore fan base, but there’s also enough satisfy the casual film-goer (who (1) isn’t out to savage the film for the sake of it and (2) judges it in its appropriate context). 3.5/5 stars!
I have caught Twilight fever.
Well, not really. I am more intrigued by why the Twilight Saga has captivated so many people as opposed to the story itself.
And after watching the second movie in the Saga, New Moon, I must admit I still don’t really get it. Is it the seemingly perfect love between a teenage girl and a vampire? Or is it the fact that their relationship is dangerous and forbidden? Or is it just because the vampire is (according to most sources) an incredibly hot dude? Or is it all of the above?
I don’t know the answer, but what I do know is that New Moon is actually a pretty decent movie. An average film overall, but in context, a fairly strong sequel. In my humble opinion, it’s certainly not worthy of the 1-star status it has been receiving from some critics. In any event, hardcore fans will undoubtedly lap it up and box office numbers should be strong simply from multiple repeat viewings from young girls (and from what I hear oldies too).
New Moon picks up from where Twilight left off, with teenager Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) and her dreamy, ‘perfect’ vampire boyfriend Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson, aka ‘Rob Patz’) rolling in the bliss of love. Those who have read the book will know what happens next, but I was quite annoyed with how the previews effectively show you the essence of the first half-hour of the movie and then reveals the major twists and secrets of the entire film! If you’ve been lucky enough to avoid the previews then I’m sure you will find New Moon a more pleasurable experience.
Anyway, I will start with the bad. New Moon is a film that first and foremost tries to satisfy the desires of its fans, and that means romance comes before everything else. While this may be great for its target audience, the problem with this is that if you’re not into the romance then the film falls apart very quickly. Or alternatively, the movie may start to feel boring and tedious. There’s a mushiness to Bella and Edward’s relationship that only a limited section of the public can truly appreciate, and I can totally understand why viewers might be turned off by some of the painful dialogue (especially at the start) – but bear in mind that most of it is apparently reproduced verbatim from the novel. Besides, dialogue is always less excrutiating on the page than it sounds on the screen.
New Moon also assumes that you know the story (or at least the first film) quite well. There are several references to characters, abilities, relationships and specific incidents from its predecessor, and your recollection and knowledge of these things are somewhat taken for granted. With my shocking memory, it did take a while for me to remember what the heck was going on.
There are also some things that weren’t explained very well by the movie which may or may not turn out to be gaping plot holes. I’ll have to reserve judgment on that until I seek clarification from a genuine Twilight fan. And there’s of course a few unintentionally funny bits simply because the film takes the whole vampire hierarchy thing so seriously.
And now the good. At its heart, New Moon is a good story. It might not be entirely original but there is a charm to it that makes it so appealing. It’s almost entrancing. For me, a big part of the film’s allure was the development of Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner), who is effectively the male lead in this one. Apart from his amazing physical transformation (which prompted him to remove his shirt at every opportunity), Jacob’s emotional growth is also well-developed. With the two lead characters (Edward and especially Bella) exhibiting selfish and unimpressive personality traits, Jacob becomes the character that viewers can empathise with the most.
I may have said earlier that New Moon is heavy on the romance, but there was still plenty of room for action. There were a number of exciting sequences littered throughout the film, most of them involving ample amounts of CGI. I wouldn’t quite call New Moon an action film, but from what I can recall it has a lot more action than Twilight. And the final climatic scenes were done much better in the sequel than the original.
Another strength of the film was its minor characters. Again, with Bella and Edward being so serious about everything (as demonstrated by the constant heavy breathing from Kristen Stewart and the permanently pained expression on Robert Pattinson’s face), comic relief came in just the right doses from an assortment of other characters. From the members in Jacob’s clan (Chaske Spencer, Tyson Houseman, Alex Meraz, Kiowa Gordon and Bronson Pelletier) to Bella’s friends Jessica (Anna Kendrick) and Mike (in terrific performance by Michael Welch) to Bella’s dad Charlie (Billy Burke) to the rest of the Cullen gang (in particular Jackson Rathbone as Jasper), almost every one of these minor characters hit the spot in their brief moments on screen. On the other hand, unfortunately, the talents of Michael Sheen and Dakota Fanning were criminally underused in their respective roles, leading to weird, comical appearances that just didn’t feel right.
At the end of the day, New Moon succeeds in what it set out to do, and that is to please its fan base. For non-hardcore fans, I think there is still enough for an enjoyable experience. There’s romance, friendship, action, suspense and a dash of timely humour. What more could you ask for in what is, essentially, a teen flick?
3.5 stars out of 5!
[PS: For the record, I have read the first book, Twilight, and watched the corresponding film. Both were okay, but neither did much for me. It just felt a little too much - too saccharine for my liking. But I could definitely see the appeal, especially to teenage girls. As a result, I skipped the remainder of the books (including New Moon), but continued to be fascinated by all the hype surrounding it. And I am looking forward to Eclipse, the next film in the series, especially as it will be directed by David Slade, director of Hard Candy and 30 Days of Night.]
Pacquiao-Mayweather: it’s all about the nickname November 22, 2009
Posted by pacejmiller in Boxing.Tags: Floyd Mayweather, Floyd Mayweather Jr, Freddie Roach, Manny Pacquiao, Marquez, Mayweather, Mayweather vs Pacquiao, Miguel Cotto, Pacquiao, Pacquiao vs Mayweather, prediction
1 comment so far
The fans want it. HBO’s president Ross Greenburg promises it. Top Rank chief Bob Arum says he would be an idiot to not make it. Freddie Roach has been wanting it for some time (and thinks Pacquiao will definitely KO Mayweather). Rugged Man demands it**. The fighters? Well, they haven’t really said they don’t want it.
Pacquiao will always espouse that crappy ‘I let my promoter decide who I fight’ line, but at least he has said he’s willing to fight anybody and when asked point blank in a recent interview he said for the record that he wants to fight Mayweather. And besides, if both Arum and Roach are determined to make it happen, then that effectively equates to Manny wanting the fight.
Therefore, the way I see it, whether the ultimate boxing match between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr will happen may depend on which of Floyd’s two nicknames he wants to adopt: ‘Money’ or ‘Pretty Boy’.
If Floyd is all about the ‘Money’ (as he claims to be), then there’s no way this fight won’t get done. Initial reports indicate that a fight between the two biggest names in boxing at the moment who also happen to be the top 2 pound-for-pound fighters in the world (how rare is that?), would surely challenge if not smash the PPV record set by De La Hoya-Mayweather in May 2007 (2.44 million PPV buys). There is not a single fight out there between any two living fighters that would generate anywhere close to the type of money that Pacquiao-Mayweather would make. Even with a 50-50 purse split (discussed further below), Mayweather would make more than double what he could make going 70-30 with any other fighter in the world.
On the other hand, if Floyd wants to remain a ‘Pretty Boy’, he can keep on ranting about how boxing ‘is a business’ or ‘doesn’t work like that’ and that he won’t do business with Bob Arum (his former promoter with whom he had a difficult falling out). Or, as Freddie Roach best put it: “When [Mayweather] says he wants 65 percent of the revenue, that’s like saying he doesn’t want to fight.” Not saying that Floyd can’t get the ‘Money’ and remain a ‘Pretty Boy’ by outclassing Pacquiao without taking a beating, but there’s no way Floyd thinks that it will be a walk in the park for him. He’s seen Diaz, De La Hoya, Hatton and Cotto. All of them (except Hatton who went out too early) looked like they had been through meat grinders after the fight. His father, Floyd Sr, is so traumatised by Pacquiao’s dominance that he has accused the Filipino superstar of being on performance-enhancing drugs.
So does Mayweather even want the fight?
I think he does, even if it’s just for the money. As made abundantly clear on his heated interview with Rugged Man, Mayweather doesn’t care about his legacy. Actually, he already believes that his legacy (as one of the greatest of all time) is set in stone. Perhaps, but if he doesn’t end up fighting Pacquiao or (to a lesser extent) Shane Mosley, that legacy will be tarnished forever. Mayweather has already carved out a reputation as a dodger of dangerous opponents (regardless of whether the reputation has merit). A single bout against Pacquiao which Mayweather says he can easily win will go a long way towards erasing that reputation, and more importantly, will make Floyd more money than he’s ever seen. No one doubts that Mayweather has the ability to beat Pacquiao, which is what makes his reluctance so frustrating.
Maybe it’s just posturing to put himself in the best position when the time comes to talk about the purse split. Maybe he just wants to stir up more controversy and paint himself as the ‘bad guy’ for more publicity for the fight. Maybe’s he’s genuinely afraid of Pacquiao. Or maybe he’s just a douche. Regardless, Floyd Mayweather Jr has been mouthing off about Manny Pacquiao since the Filipino’s impressive victory over Miguel Cotto.
“I’m in a no-win situation,” Mayweather said. “If I beat Manny Pacquiao you know what they are going to say? ‘You are supposed to beat him, you are Floyd Mayweather, you are the bigger man.’ If I knock him out they’ll say, ‘You’re supposed to knock him out [because] he’s been knocked out before.’ I’m in a no-win situation and when I beat him no one is going to be surprised because he’s been beaten before. Whatever I do to Pacquiao has been done before. He’s been beaten on three occasions. And if I knock him out I don’t want the world shouting because he’s been knocked out twice before.”
When Floyd Mayweather Jr says fighting Pacquiao is a “no-win situation” for him, all it is doing is make him look like he is looking for a way out.
Floyd has also been trying to shift the blame to Pacquaio in case the fight doesn’t happen. As quoted in Dan Rafael’s blog at ESPN, Mayweather says that Pacquiao doesn’t want to fight him because Manny knows he can’t beat Floyd. Despite not having said once that he wants to fight Pacquiao, Mayweather is now saying that Manny has not come out and said publicly he wants a piece of Floyd. This may be true, but Pacquiao doesn’t need to. Arum makes Pacquiao’s fights and Arum has made it unequivocally clear that he will do everything he can to make the Mayweather bout happen. In contrast, according his own words, Mayweather is his “own boss”, speaks for himself and “tell it like it is.” This actually makes Floyd look worse because it just means it has been his own personal choice to dodge all the top, prime welterweights, and that if a fight with Pacquiao doesn’t happen, it’s because Floyd doesn’t want it to.
In response, Bob Arum simply said: “All I want to say is that my guy [Pacquiao] has said, ‘We’re here, we’re ready to fight Mayweather.’ “ This was confirmed in the link above to the video interview.
In the end, I don’t think Floyd really has a choice. Neither does Manny for that matter. If either one of them backs out from this fight to take on another boxer (or retire), especially when all the stars are seemingly aligned, there will be so much public backlash and animosity against that man that it will have a permanent impact on his reputation and career.
Purse and weight negotiations
The logical purse split for a fight of this magnitude is 50-50. Most commentators are now of the opinion that this will not be difficult to achieve given the amount of money that is at stake.
From Pacquaio’s side, the man doing the negotiating is obviously Top Rank’s Bob Arum. And on Mayweather’s side, Richard Schaefer of Golden Boy will represent Floyd (as Floyd has signed a 5-fight deal with them). Al Haymon and Leonard Ellerbe are Floyd’s advisers who will liaise closely with Schaefer to ensure the negotiations reflect Floyd’s intentions.
There will probably be a bit of back and forth with both sides arguing that they should get he lion’s share of the purse. Mayweather’s camp will argue that he is undefeated and that his PPV numbers against their common opponents (De La Hoya, Hatton and Marquez) were better than Pacquiao’s. On the other hand, Pacquiao’s camp will argue that Manny’s most recent PPV numbers (the Cotto fight did at least 1.25 million buys) are more impressive than Floyd’s (the Marquez fight did 1.05 million PPV buys) and that when Mayweather fought De La Hoya and Hatton, the global financial crisis hadn’t struck yet. Plus, Marquez really only made a name for himself because he was in two very tight contests against Pacquiao.
I believe they will settle on 50-50 in the end. Both Mayweather and Arum’s egos are too big to allow the other to get even a couple of percentage points on them. And honestly, I think 50-50 is a fair result. There is no doubt that Pacquiao is the bigger international superstar at the moment and is by far the more exciting fighter, but Floyd is an equally big draw because he’s also a crossover star and people would pay to see him lose.
As for the weight, there shouldn’t be much controversy. 147 pounds. Pacquiao may try to seek a Cotto-esque weight of 145, but as we have seen Mayweather’s fight with Marquez, Floyd doesn’t really care about the contracted weight restrictions. The weight should be a big advantage for Mayweather as we know that Manny maxes out at around 148 on fight night whereas Floyd, who refused to be re-weighed for the Marquez fight, should be at least 155.
Preliminary prediction
So assuming this megafight will happen some time around May 2010, it’s time to make a preliminary prediction.
I just want to preface this by saying that there is no point comparing the Manny Pacquaio of the past to the Manny Pacquiao of now. Too often I see people downplaying Pacquiao’s chances in this fight based on what happened to him more than 10 years ago (when he suffered 2 KO losses and a draw as a weight-drained Flyweight or Bantamweight) , against Erik Morales (who won their first encounter via decision but was knocked out in the 2 rematches), and against Juan Manuel Marquez (with whom Pacquiao had a draw and split decision win over, though both were questionable). Morales was Pacquiao’s last loss and it was more than 4 years ago when Pacquiao was at super featherweight (130 pounds). The two fights against Marquez were at featherweight (126 pounds) and super featherweight (130 pounds). Pacquiao is a true 140-147 pounder now, and he is much better at this weight. He has somehow managed to increase his speed, power and endurance, and he is now significantly more experienced, patient, and obedient when it comes to following Freddie Roach’s game plans. There’s just no comparison. If he fought the fat, old Marquez we saw against Mayweather now…well, I’ll let you draw your own conclusions.
As for the Pacquiao-Mayweather, it’s a tough call, but I see three possible scenarios. The first is that Floyd Mayweather Jr is simply too big and too skilled, and just outboxes Pacquiao with his superior reach and defense to claim an easy points decision victory, kind of in the same mould as the Marquez fight. Floyd has a 5 inch reach advantage (72-67) on Pacquiao, and is the naturally bigger man with phenomenal speed and an awkwardness that will frustrate any fighter. Pacquiao has never fought someone as quick, skilled and big as Mayweather, and it could prove to be a gap too wide.
However, I cannot see Floyd knocking out Pacquiao unless Manny loses his cool and is tagged by a big counter (like when Mayweather KO’ed Hatton). In his last few fights, Pacquiao has demonstrated a vastly improved defense and plenty of caution and discipline. He no longer jumps in recklessly and rarely leaves himself wide open, so the chances of a counter-punch KO are slim. Besides, Pacquiao showed in the Cotto fight that he can take a punch at welterweight. I have since watched the Cotto fight a couple more times, and Manny really got tagged with some nasty shots. Stiff jabs, jolting uppercuts, ripping body blows. And he took them all. Pacquiao had a busted ear drum to go with bad swelling from the fight. He could have used his trademark in-and-out style all night to beat Cotto but instead chose to stand his ground and take the shots head on. As he said, he wanted to test Cotto’s power, and he passed the test with flying colours. There is no way Mayweather hits harder than Cotto. With Floyd’s brittle hands, there’s just no way.
On the other hand, the second and third scenarios I see both have Manny Pacquiao emerging as the victor – either by unanimous decision or KO. Pacquiao has comparable hand speed to Mayweather and possibly better foot speed, and definitely more power. Floyd may be a defensive specialist, but Manny is an offensive specialist. I can see a situation where Pacquiao utilises his seemingly endless energy to pressure Mayweather all night and keep raining rapid combos down on him. Floyd may bob and weave and shoulder roll and block, but every blow that connects will count. Floyd may be fantastic at toying with guys that can only throw 1 or 2 punches at a time from orthodox angles, but it remains to be seen how he can handle someone like Pacquiao – a tireless freak with speed and power in both hands that attacks in 3, 4, 5, 6 punch combinations from angles you just don’t expect and don’t see coming (just ask Miguel Cotto).
This assessment is somewhat similar to what Freddie Roach said on ESPN: “Whatever Floyd gives us, we’ll take. Manny will [hit] him on the arms, the shoulders, wherever he can, and Mayweather will feel it. There’s no way Mayweather can win the fight running, and that’s what he does best.”
Zab Judah was probably the closest thing to Pacquiao that Mayweather has fought, but he was too undisciplined and has a soft jaw. And let’s not forget, Judah hit Mayweather with quite a few shots early on in that fight (including a genuine knockdown that wasn’t counted), but didn’t have the resiliency or stamina to carry it through to the end.
Jose Luis Castillo, who lost 2 decisions to Mayweather (the first of which some thought he won – though Mayweather had a shoulder injury at the time), sparred with Pacquiao in the lead up to the Cotto fight, and said that Pacquiao is faster and hits way harder than Mayweather. And this is the Pacquiao at 144 pounds compared to the Mayweather at lightweight (135 pounds). Maybe he’s still bitter about his first fight with Mayweather, but if there’s any truth to what Castillo said, then Mayweather could be in for a long night.
Accordingly, in my Pacquiao-wins scenario, if Floyd runs, I see him losing a decision. If he stands his ground, I see him getting knocked out.
So which of the 3 scenarios is most likely? At this stage I have to go what would appear to be the most unlikely – Pacquiao by KO! People may say that Mayweather’s style will give Pacquiao fits but the same could be said the other way around. If Pacquiao stays patient and keeps the pressure on and is disciplined with his approach, I think he can win. Otherwise it just means Floyd Mayweather Jr is really that good. And after watching some of Floyd’s past fights on YouTube, I would not be surprised if he is. The guy is truly amazing.
At the end of the day, I have a feeling that the Cotto fight will be the reason Pacquiao will win. Floyd took an easy fight in ‘lightweight’ Marquez, and Pacquiao took the hard fight in Cotto, and I believe that will ultimately be the difference.
** For those who don’t already know, Rugged Man is an emcee who recently OWNED Mayweather on radio for 20 minutes. Essentially, he took it right to Mayweather from the start about avoiding the big fights and said what has been on every non-Mayweather-ballhugger’s mind for years. YouTube ‘Rugged Man’ and ‘Mayweather’ and listen to it. It’s not only revealing but also extraordinarily hilarious.
Movie Review: Paranormal Activity (2009) November 17, 2009
Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews.Tags: alternate endings, Blair Witch, Blair Witch Project, documentary, horror, Paranormal Activity, Paranormal Activity review, sequel
add a comment

Paranormal Activity is the latest ‘is it real or not?’, low-budget horror movie pieced together with supposed amateur home video footage. Think The Blair Witch Project for haunted houses.
While I liked the overall idea and it’s by no means a terrible film, Paranormal Activity didn’t really do it for me. Maybe I just wasn’t in the mood to be scared. It did have its moments, but certainly isn’t the ’scariest’ or ‘most terrifying’ movie of all time (or even the year) as it has been hyped up to be.
The footage begins when young couple Micah and Katie, living together in a fairly nice suburban house, decide to get a video camera to capture the paranormal activity they have been experiencing. There is a bit of a back story and you get to know the characters are little through footage of their daily lives, but I found these to be time fillers than any real effort to allow the audience to get to know, and perhaps even care about, these people.
Like The Blair Witch Project, the tension in Paranormal Activity is built up slowly and gradually, with the intent of blowing the audience away with a ripper of an ending. However, even at only 86 minutes, it felt like nothing was happening for a really long time. A few bumps in the night, a few eerie things here and there, but for the most part they seemed like relatively minor incidents that were met with overreaction. I understand director and writer Oren Peli’s intention to build an atmospheric film that utilises dread rather than cheap scares, but I spent much of the movie wishing something would actually happen. I will say, though, that there were a couple of pretty cool things that happened towards the end, but unfortunately the final sequences weren’t as chilling as I had hoped.**
The film’s biggest problem, from which most of its other problems stemmed, was the restrictive nature of its format. Of course, as the audience, you only get to see what has recorded by the inhabitants of the house. But that raises some very difficult obstacles. How much can you reasonably expect someone who is being terrified by demons to tape everything that happens to them? Do you go the realistic route and miss out on some of the action? Or do you come up with forced excuses to make them take the video camera everywhere and record everything? Either way, the film suffers.
To its credit, Paranormal Activity tries to reach some sort of balance between the two extremes. As the inhabitants actually set out to capture and document the haunting, a camera is set up in the bedroom and runs throughout the night, and that is when most of the creepy stuff happens. In my opinion, that was by far the cleverest idea in the film. Every time the bedroom cam is set up and the residents to go bed, I start to swell up with anticipation as the clock fast forwards to when ’stuff’ happens. Occasionally, they venture out of the bedroom in hand-held mode, but thankfully the footage is not as shaky or nauseating as it could have been.
However, what this system also means is that some scenes are left to your imagination because you can’t see what is going on – sometimes that may be more frightening, but that’s not always the case in this movie. It also means that at least one of the characters has to be a totally unreasonable prick so the camera can be kept running, but it gets to the point where it becomes a stretch. With this type of film format, you just have to take the good with the bad.
Paranormal Activity also suffers from a few other issues. This kind of film thrives on the gullibility of the audience. The more you believe it is real, the scarier it becomes. The problem is, while both leads were adequate, there were a couple of occasions where they felt unnatural. Could be the dialogue or the acting, but I wasn’t convinced I was watching authentic footage. One of the reasons why The Blair Witch Project was so successful was because it misled people into believing that the footage was real. The film was presented and marketed as authentic. 10 years later, this has become a lot more difficult to accomplish, and as a result Paranormal Activity doesn’t have quite the same impact as its predecessor.
In the end, Paranormal Activity is a film worth watching simply because it is fresh and not done very often. And to be fair, it also has some solid, atmospheric moments. That said, lower your expectations if you want to be genuinely frightened.
3 stars out of 5!
** Apparently there are at least 3 alternative endings for this film, and I don’t quite think the one released in the cinemas is the best one. See here for more details.
PS: a sequel is already in the works thanks to the success of the film, which is already the most successful independent film ever in terms of return on investment. Let’s just hope the sequel is at least watchable, unlike that dreadful sequel to Blair Witch which I still rank up there as one of the worst sequels of all time.
Pacquiao shreds Cotto; TKO round 12 November 15, 2009
Posted by pacejmiller in Boxing.Tags: Analysis, Cotto, Diamond Belt, Fire Power, Floyd Mayweather Jr, Freddie Roach, Manny Pacquiao, Miguel Cotto, Pacquiao, Pacquiao vs Cotto, result
5 comments

Pacquiao TKOs Cotto to win his 7th world title in as many weight classes
I just got home from the pub after witnessing Manny Pacquiao TKO Miguel Cotto in the final round of 12 exciting rounds of boxing. With the win, Pacquiao collected his 7th world title in as many weight divisions, a new record. He also snatched Cotto’s WBO welterweight belt (even though the fight took place 2 pounds below the welterweight limit of 147) and added some stupid, pointless WBC ‘Diamond Belt’ to his collection.
The fight lived up to the name ‘Fire Power’ – Cotto was a very game opponent that just ran into a buzzsaw by the name of Manny Pacquiao that bruised, battered and sliced him up. By the time the fight was mercifully stopped 55 seconds into the 12th and final round, Cotto’s face was a swollen, bloody mess. Cotto’s white shorts were dyed pink and Pacquiao’s body was littered with dry speckles of Cotto’s blood.

Cotto's face was a mess
I know it sounds like a one-sided affair, but it wasn’t, not at least for the first half of the fight. Cotto had his moments, especially early on. He scared Pacquiao fans in the first round (which I think Cotto won easily) with his devastating power, as even blocked punches lifted Pacquiao’s feet off the canvas. It certainly got the attention of the people I watched the fight with at the pub (95% of which were pro-Pacquiao). A number of them voiced that it may be a long night for Manny.
In the second round, Pacquiao began throwing his lightning quick combinations, and I think it was enough to earn him the round. However, it was an uneasy round, especially whenever Cotto backed Pacquiao up against the ropes, which was happening more regularly than trainer Freddie Roach would have liked. Pacquiao would hold his hands up high while Cotto pounded him on the waistline and face. Even if most of them were blocked (at least partially), it gave me the feeling that Cotto was going to wear Pacquiao down eventually.
The third round was more of the same, with Cotto pounding away and Pacquiao blocking patiently and picking his spots, unleashing rapid combos at all angles whenever the opportunity arose. Then suddenly, Cotto was down! It was a lightning quick right hand and the end of a combo that caught Cotto on the jaw, dropping him to one knee. However, it was just a flash knockdown, and Cotto came back hard for the remainder of that round. Even though Pacquiao won that round with the knockdown, there was question over whether it should have been scored 10-8 or 10-9.
Up to that stage, it was still a close fight. I had the feeling that if Cotto caught Manny with a flush power shot, it could be all over in a hurry. But even if he didn’t, Cotto still had the tools to box his way to a victory. That was how things looked at the time. But then, towards the end of the 4th round, Cotto walked in and Pacquiao unloaded a huge left hand that rocked Cotto and put him down for the second time. This one wasn’t a flash knockdown. You could tell from Cotto’s wobbly legs that he was definitely hurt. If it had happened earlier in the round, Pacquiao could have very well finished him off right there.

Cotto was not the same after the second knockdown
In his corner, Cotto was spitting blood and a small cut had appeared under his right eye. He was desperate for air and his eyes were beginning to swell shut. In the other corner, Pacquiao looked like he was just warming up, though he seemed to be still focused on the game plan.
From that point on, Cotto just wasn’t the same. He put in a good effort for the start of the 5th, but Pacquiao’s speedy combinations proved the difference. Without watching the fight again, I can’t recall exactly when it happened, but at some stage in the second half of the bout, Pacquiao suddenly became the aggressor. It was a complete role reversal. Pacquiao, the smaller man, was backing Cotto up, and Cotto, the supposedly stronger boxer, was back-pedaling more than De La Hoya did against Trinidad. By this point, Cotto was simply trying to survive until the end. Every time Pacquiao had Cotto in the corner or against the roles, it looked like Pacquiao would end the fight right there, but to his credit, Cotto somehow managed to evade danger time after time.
Pacquiao was still sticking to the game plan and fighting with caution, though I’m not sure Cotto even had a puncher’s chance from the 8th round onwards. He still had heart but his will was gone. It was just a question of whether he’d be able to survive till the final bell. Pacquiao was visibly frustrated by Cotto’s dancing and unwillingness to engage with him, at times standing still and dropping his hands, as though questioning Cotto whether he really wanted to continue.
Cotto back-pedaled his way into the 12th round. Pacquiao continued to be semi-cautious, but was definitely going for the knockout. About 50 seconds into the round, Pacquiao finally caught up to Cotto and trapped him against the ropes. Another combination flooded down upon Cotto, though most of them were probably blocked. Pacquiao was ready for more, but referee Kenny Bayless stepped in to protect Cotto, calling the fight with 2 minutes and 5 seconds to go. I thought it was a questionable stoppage as Cotto may have been able to survive till the end, but there was no doubt that Manny Pacquiao would have won the fight by a wide margin if it went to the scorecards.
Pacquaio landed 336/780 (43%) punches overall, including 276/560 (49%) power punches. As Cotto barely threw any punches for the last third of the bout, he only landed 172/597 (29%) in total punches, with 93/300 (31%) in power punches.
In the end, all the talk about Pacquiao’s disrupted training camp, Cotto’s inexperienced trainer and everything in between didn’t really manifest in the fight. Cotto gave Pacquiao more trouble than David Diaz, Oscar De La Hoya and Ricky Hatton (Pacquiao’s last 3 opponents) combined, but Manny was still a cut above him. And the catch weight of 145 pounds had little effect – Cotto looked better than he ever had at the weigh-in and on the night of the fight. It was evidently a very successful weight management campaign, which probably led to Cotto having up to 10 pounds on Pacquiao by the time they entered the ring. It made no difference in the end.

Bring on Floyd Mayweather Jr!
Cotto was very gracious in defeat, approaching and hugging Pacquiao. “I didn’t know from where the punches were coming,” Cotto said later before heading to the hospital for tests. “Manny Pacquiao is one of the best boxers I ever fought.”
As for the new welterweight champion and pound-for-pound king, there is only one fight fans want to see. As Freddie Roach said: “I want to see him fight Mayweather.”
Movie Review: 2012 (2009) November 14, 2009
Posted by pacejmiller in Movie Reviews.Tags: 2012, 2012 movie, Chiwetel Ejiofor, disaster, end of the world, John Cusack, Mayan prophecy, Roland Emmerich, Woody Harrelson
2 comments

2012 (the movie not the year) is pretty much what you would expect from a US$200 million blockbuster about the end of the world directed by Roland Emmerich (Independence Day, The Day After Tomorrow). Eye-popping special effects, an epic storyline, a multitude of characters, cliched dialogue, bad jokes, cringe-worthy moments and cheesy one-liners.
And yet, for all its flaws, 2012 is surprisingly absorbing. It is somewhat overlong at a whopping 158 minutes, but it’s never easy for such films to be short these days.
The plot – well, pretty self-explanatory. Do I really need to say anything? I am glad to say that they didn’t try to milk the whole Mayan calendar thing. It was not much more than a passing reference in the end.
The science of it all was sketchy in my opinion, but I’m not sure they really cared. As the film rolled along, it became clear that suspension of disbelief was imperative to an enjoyable experience. Too many things were either implausible or impossible or simply didn’t make sense. The sooner you realised that this was going to be the norm the better.
Of course, epic movies like 2012 require a lot of characters. Sure, most of them were cliched and cardboard stereotypes (especially the minor ones), but what I liked about it was that they were all linked in one way or another. It wasn’t just a random bunch of people who had nothing to do with each other.
The characters were portrayed by a great ensemble cast led by Chiwetel Ejiofor and John Cusack, together with Amanda Peet, Thandie Newton, Oliver Platt, and a bizarre appearance by Woody Harrelson. The only notable weakness was Danny Glover as the President of the United States. It was just a laughable performance. Think of an old and tired Barack Obama who has lost his voice and charm after being disillusioned with being in office for 30 years straight.
Although entirely predictable, sentimental and silly, 2012 still managed to eke out some thrills and excitement. As I said before, if you can suspend disbelief and just go along for the ride, the film is pure pop-corn fun. Even if you can’t, there’s at least the special effects to enjoy. More impressive than Independence Day, The Day After Tomorrow, Deep Impact, Armageddon, The War of the Worlds and The Day the Earth Stood Still, the visuals in 2012 are the most spectacular I’ve ever seen. If 2012 (the movie) turns out to be prophetic, none of us will have the time or mood to witness the destruction of the earth, so this film is the best opportunity we have.
3.5 stars out of 5!







Stumble It!

